Fearing the rhesus revolution
August 26, 2012 Leave a comment
It’s an exciting time. The Republican National Convention is about to start. This is Romney’s chance to shine. But the press has been stuck on the narrative that unwelcome events keep the GOP off message. This is where media malfeasance has steered us, to meta-news, news about news. Who is responsible for determining what the media covers? Whoops, we’re not supposed to ask that kind of question.
The New York Times Magazine commemorates the advent of the Republican convention with a dour examination of the host city, Tampa, Florida. Writer John Mooallem brings us the saga of a renegade rhesus macaque. As he tells it, this indomitable monkey has become a sort of resistance symbol and a focal point for anti-government sentiment.
From start to finish, he peppers the piece with liberal complaints. Opening up, he finds fault with the American flag flying over a local restaurant. It’s “preposterously large.” He reveals that, en route to covering the story, he tortured himself by listening to conservative talk radio. From what I can tell, he’s done this for no other reason than to complain about it in writing afterward.
With respect to the monkey controversy itself, Mooallem makes his sympathies very clear. He’s supportive of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, who the locals see as “the Gestapo.” The writer’s sentiment crystallizes in this assessment of the state officers:
But they took a somewhat traditional view: the American people had a right to be protected by their government from wild monkeys. It was disorienting to watch the people of Tampa Bay champion the monkey’s rights instead.
That an idea like freedom might trump the public order deeply troubles him. To counter such libertarian exuberance, he quotes one man’s stern warning: “Sometimes, freedom isn’t necessarily a good idea.” In true liberal fashion, the writer is most at home expressing his convictions as an equivocal miasma.
Nonetheless, he seems to advance a genuine concern about public order and safety. Mooallem unmistakably condemns Tampans’ refusal to cooperate with the animal control agency. But I suspect he doesn’t feel the same way about the Holder Justice Department’s bitter reluctance to enforce federal deportation laws. Per his metric, why shouldn’t the prospect of fellow humans living an uncertain, shadow existence elicit the same kind of concern?
At any rate, pieces like Mooallem’s are the Sunday afternoon grist that Northeastern cultural elites relax by. Harper’s, Atlantic, The New Yorker, anything that will allow them to look with detached pity and concern upon their benighted countrymen in the far flung regions.
I recall a long-running TV ad from some years ago. In an effort to get the viewer to subscribe to the weekend edition of the New York Times, a woman would exclaim, “For me, that’s what Sundays were made for!” Back then, I suspected this woman’s compatriots would profess that Sunday was “made” with a nobler purpose in mind.
With aching essays like the Tampa monkey expose, the folks at the Times demonstrate they are just as aloof of Middle America today as they’ve ever been.