The half-life of racism
September 8, 2012 2 Comments
Attorney General Eric Holder made a bit of a splash when speaking at Columbia earlier this year. He told the audience at his alma mater that he could not imagine a time when the need for racial preferences like affirmative action would cease.
So at what point does racism stop mattering in American life? Perhaps you’ve entertained this question before. If government, civil society and churches have been laboring against this great sin for decades, is there anything to show for it?
Surely, in 300 years, after our great-grandchildren are deceased, the old, nasty attitudes so prevalent before the Civil Rights era will have been expunged. But if not, there will be sophisticated equipment–maybe like a Star Trek tricorder–to empirically identify any remnants.
For now, we are lucky to have wagging tongues like Chris Matthews to tell us when someone is being racist. Or, we can just as well heed the dire warnings of speakers at this year’s Democratic National Convention.
Anyone who genuinely seeks a substantive discussion of issues, such as our raging national debt or the proper scope of federal government, has required a little patience in dealing with smokescreens thrown up by progressives and Democrats. We know these as racism, the war on women, homophobia and so on.
The identity politics fiefdom built on these “wedge” issues is troubling in how it treats people in need as abstractions, not individuals. The long history of progressive prescriptions affirms the ineffectiveness of promises perennially extended toward these abstracted victims. President Johnson launched a “War on Poverty” in the 1960s, but the numbers of poor and dependent have reliably increased in the decades since. Why should we think that President Obama, in spending ever more sums on the same problems, will change that?
While some conditions haven’t improved, there has been tremendous progress on societal attitudes. Among those born after the tumult of the 1960s, the ideal of “equality” crowns the paramount virtue of “tolerance.” But many remain beholden to the hope that just a little more money to social programs, a little more Ad Council propaganda, will actually change conditions for the abstraction.
What if these well-intended moves crowd out the healthy habits and cultural capital necessary to the success of the individual? These, not the wasteful expenditures of federal welfare programs, are what can change conditions on the ground. But to assess this soberly will require a little distance from the crooning promises of “Hope and Change” or MSNBC’s alarmist cries of “racism!”
Would it be safe to say that, in America today, we’re beyond the half-life of racism or patriarchy? Existential struggle against oppression need not trump every policy consideration. As I noted recently, a diverse lineup of thought leaders in media and at this year’s Republican National Convention have given us hope that we’re past that point. For the sake of true progress, and the issues that really matter, I hope November will reflect a similar move among the population at large.